This week, I focus on what is commonly known as “ObamaCare”, or the Affordable Care Act and more generally, my political beliefs.
Early speculation is all over the board on this. Predictably, those who favor a single-payer, government-run health care system are saying that the court will decide in favor of the individual mandate (found unconstitutional by the 11th Circuit Court but constitutional by the 6th Circuit Court). Those who oppose it predict the opposite. Both sides, however, are united in one aspect: the vote will be close – likely 5-4. The Obama administration is confident that they will prevail. So much so, that they don’t have a Plan B should the individual mandate be struck down and moreover, they’ve not even argued that the mandate is severable from the rest of the law. I think that those who oppose it have the better argument, but logic often doesn’t sway the mind.
My take on this law is this: if left in its’ current state, it will A) bankrupt an already financial weak government (you and me) and B) will forever change the nature of the relationship between the citizen and the Federal Government. It will set the stage to wipe out whatever is left of the enumerate powers doctrine and in the long run, will make the state governments virtually meaningless. Under the commerce clause, there will *nothing* that the Federal Government won’t be able to compel its’ citizen to do. If our mere existence on this planet constitutes participation in an economy that the Feds can legislate, then say good-bye to any sense of freedom.
I know my liberal friends are rolling their eyes right now and wondering what planet I was born on. That’s fine. But I’ll go out on a limb and predict this: If the individual mandate is upheld as constitutional, Congress will have no restraint whatsoever on its’ continuing thirst for power. In their arrogance, they will feel that they can regulate and dictate any part of our lives they choose. I’m not kidding. In the 230+ years of our country, I can’t recall one single Congressional term where they voluntarily relinquished power to the states. They have totally ignored the 10th amendment – with the help of the supreme court – and the states have progressively become more irrelevant over the last 10-15 decades. What does it matter what your state does? The Feds control the purse strings ever since I can remember as a way forcing the states to do what they want.
In addition, in short, I fully disagee that Congress should have the power to compel the individual to participate in a particular type of commerce in order to then regulate your actions either within that commerce or that might affect that commerce.
We are at a pivotal point in our history. This isn’t about helping those who can’t help themselves. There were plenty of other ways for Obama to get what he wanted without this going to the Supreme Court. He could have passed a national tax and redistributed that money to government-run health care programs. He could have setup or reformatted DHS with a supporting tax that could have accomplished *everything* he wants. But instead, he chose to go this route. He and his team *knew* what they were doing. It’s not a reach of logic to conclude that this method was chosen because not only did it create a national health care plan, but they wanted it in a way that once implemented, it could *never* be reversed. Changing the balance of power is a sure way to ensure that once you have the power, you won’t let it go.
Republican and Democrat congresses alike have asserted too much power over the states. The 10th amendment is clear, but the states haven’t pushed back. Both Republican and Democrat Presidents have asserted power that was never theirs to assert. For example, do you recall Nixon fixing prices? The constitution didn’t give him this power, yet he took it on himself and no one challenged him on it. Bush 43 and Obama both started or perpetuated wars without congressional approval. Congress bitched about it, but did little in the way of real accountability to stop them. It’s about power, my friends, and this law – under the guise of improved health care – is the biggest power grab I’ve ever seen. Once they control your health care, they have you well and truly by the short hairs. Under the guise of improving health and lowering costs for everyone, they will tell you what food to eat, how often you should exercise, what amusements you can and can’t enjoy, what risks you can and can’t take – even what parts of your religion will be deemed compatible with their ideas of “healthy” and what parts aren’t. You might laugh and write me off. But I’m not kidding. They will control every part of your life. What car you drive, if you can shoot a gun, what sports kids can play in, if you smoke or not, what foods you consume, what kind of cell phone you can use, etc… , because (in their minds), everything you do is related in one way or another to health care and everything you do is an act that falls under the commerce clause.
I don’t care about party affiliations anymore. What I care about is limited government, preserving our Federal system and ensuring that power divided is power checked. I’ll vote for anyone of any party who espouses a view of freedom over equality of results. Obamacare is an example of equality of results.
On a larger point, here is what I believe about politics:
- God is in control. Period. In spite of all our problems, I can rest in His sovereignty.
- Government’s primary role is to preserve individual freedom and ensure justice. (I don’t believe there are different types of justice such as economic or reproductive justice. Properly understood, justice is a base concept, not divisible by topical focus)
- Government should focus on the equality of opportunity and not equality of results
- Individuals are endowed by *God* with certain rights that only a Godless government will take away
- Socialism is first a Godless system
- There is a law given by God that is above our laws
- The concepts of private property, self-responsibility, honesty, a strong work-ethic, profits and bankruptcy – all are concepts found in the Bible.
- The more a society jettisons God in the public square, the more they move toward socialism because Government replaces God.
- We loan to the government power to minimally restrict our freedoms for the greater good
- You don’t help the employee by hurting the employer
- Bankruptcy is the proper remedy for bad business decisions
- Freedom is messy. There is always collateral damage in a free society. There is also collateral benefit in a free society.
- Referencing #11, In a socialistic society, you have the former without the latter.
- You don’t create wealth through government spending
- You don’t create wealth through redistribution of income
- Governments never allocate resources as efficiently as the free markets
- Power divided is power checked
- The government does not exist to solve my problems or remove my pain
- Profits are good when earned fairly and lawfully
- More guns in the hands of law-abiding citizens reduces violent crime
- Government does not have the capacity to “care”
- In our system of government, the quality of our government is directly related to the integrity, character and maturity of those we elect into office
- Redistribution of wealth to achieve social goals *will* fail in the long run
- Every society needs the rich
- You cannot spend more than what you have and remain solvent
- Well written laws applied fairly without prejudice is a core part of a solid foundation for a good society
- I will defend your right to non-violently disagree with me, because that is also a core part of a solid foundation for a free society
- God gives us the right to defend ourselves.
- Long-term welfare – whether corporate or individual – creates a dependency class that votes in conflict with their own interests
- There is a place for proper public/private investments in innovation *IF* the innovation can be proven to be profitable within a short amount of time
- #29 and #30 are not contradictory
- Classism (hating someone because of their success in life) is just as morally wrong as racism or sexism
- It is wrong for politicians to pit one class against another for political gain
- It is wrong for politicians to pit one religion against another for political gain
- The need does not constitute the reason for another government program
- Governments license it, legislate it, regulate it and tax it. It doesn’t really matter what “it” is.
- Governments have little self-control.
- We elect our government officials, but God chooses our leaders. Did I mention that God is in control?